OP062, Ziggo Operation: Censorship via Cyber Attack to Vanish Content - Repeated Cyber Attacks during Working on Research Paper PD8 - ICCG did not like the Concept in the Research Paper that International Law is above the Law of a particular Sovereign Country - Likely that Israel responsible for these Cyber-Attacks

https://www.rozen-bakher.com/iccg/op062

Latest Update: 17 November 2023

OP062, Ziggo Operation: Censorship via Cyber Attack to Vanish Content - Repeated Cyber Attacks during Working on Research Paper PD8 - ICCG did not like the Concept in the Research Paper that International Law is above the Law of a particular Sovereign Country - Likely that Israel responsible for these Cyber-Attacks, https://www.rozen-bakher.com/iccg/op062, Residence Location, Netherlands, Main Entity, E048, Ziggo (Internet, Mailbox-Outlook, Fax, Landline), Netherlands

Highlights

During the working on the research paper PD8, repeated cyber-attacks occurred against the laptop of Dr. Rozen-Bakher even when the laptop was offline. This method repeated itself when Dr. Rozen-Bakher works on research papers that ICCG don’t like. In this research paper, ICCG did not like the part in the Research Paper that deal with the International Law, and in particular, the concept that the International Law is above the Law of a particular Sovereign Country, namely if exists a contradiction or a conflict between the law of a particular sovereign country and the international law, then international law should be above the law of certain country. Note, Israel is very sensitive to this topic because there are Israeli laws and regulations that contradict the International Law. Thereby, likely that these cyber attacks came directly from Israel or indirectly from people/organizations/institutions that are related to Israel yet their location is in Europe.

 

The part about the International Law from Research Paper PD8 that ICCG did not like, namely that the international law is above the law of a particular sovereign country.

International Law. The international law arena refers to international laws (Dixon, 2013; Von Glahn & Taulbee, 2017) that are determined by international organisations and come into force by the approval of international courts. International courts also serve as arbitrators in order to solve disputes. Moreover, the international legal arena is also determined by international agreements and conventions, which are based on the ratifications and obligations of the countries (Thirlway, 2010). However, on the one hand, a country can choose if to ratify international agreements and conventions, but on the other, a country and its organisations must obey any international law that is enacted, even if the law was accepted or not by the country or by its organisations. Hence, international law is above the law of a particular sovereign country. Nevertheless, there are sovereign countries that have national laws that are in force in the sovereign territory of the country, despite that the national laws contradict the international laws. Therefore, if exists a contradiction or a conflict between the law of a particular sovereign country and the international law, then international law is more powerful compared to the law at the national level. Considering that, in cases of disputes and conflicts between countries, or between countries and companies or individuals, or between MNEs, then international courts adjudicate the cases based on international law. Notwithstanding, in many cases, MNEs are forced to operate under national laws that are contradicted to international laws. In spite of that, if a dispute arises, then MNEs have the right to give an appeal to an international court against the host country that acts contrary to international laws.