Ending Gaza War via One-Point Plan: Establishing the State of Palestine by Ending the Israeli Occupation of Gaza and West Bank
https://www.rozen-bakher.com/timeline-risks/30/09/2025/0732
Published Date: 30 September 2025
Risks Timeline by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher
Comments on Contemporary Risks by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher
Risks Timeline by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher https://www.rozen-bakher.com/timeline-risks-all
Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher
Researcher in International Relations with a Focus on Security, Political and Economic Risks for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and International Trade
30 September 2025 at 07:32. Usually we are saying that the ‘Evil in the Details’, but in the case of Trump’s 20-point proposal to end the war in Gaza (see below), we don’t need to look in-depth at the details to find the ‘evil’ because Trump’s 20-point proposal is so manipulated that the ‘evil’ stretches all over its 20 points.
I spare you the long explanation of why each section in Trump’s 20-point proposal has ‘Evil in the Details’ in the good scenario, while it is a pure-evil-manipulation plan in the bad scenario, namely Israel first will get the hostages, and after that, Israel will continue with the plan of ‘Jewish Riviera in Gaza’ under any pretext to violate the deal, as Israel has violated the previous ceasefire with Gaza, as well as the ceasefire with Lebanon, regardless of Israel’s attacks against Syria and Iran, and even drone attacks in Africa and Europe against Aid-Ships that sail to Gaza.
Considering the above, permanently ending the Gaza War and the ethnic cleansing in the West Bank can be achieved only via the One-Point Peace Deal, namely Establishing the State of Palestine by Ending the Israeli Occupation of Gaza and the West Bank based on the Green-Lines (1967). The State of Palestine should not be a Colony of the USA/UK under ‘Governor Blair‘, but a sovereign state that is run by Palestinians under democratic elections with an army for defence like any other UN sovereign state. To illustrate it, was it possible to end the British mandate and to establish the State of Israel by demanding the disarmament of Haganah, Lehi, Irgun-Etzel, and Palmach that were merged into the Israeli Defence Force (IDF)? Was it possible to establish the State of Israel by demanding from the members of Haganah, Lehi, Irgun-Etzel, and Palmach to leave the State of Israel?
Obviously NOT, despite that the British treated them like Jewish terrorists because they resisted the British Occupation of Palestine (see below). The same is for the Palestinian Resistance Groups. Hamas is not a Terrorist Group like the Islamic State but a Resistance Group like the Norwegian Resistance Group that fought against the occupation of Norway by the Nazis, still, Hamas not only fights against 'regular occupation' but also against Genocide, starvation, intentional devastation, and cruel occupation.
Risks Timeline by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher, 08 April 2022, What Israel could Learn From its History regarding the Occupation of Palestine?: Resistance versus Terrorism https://www.rozen-bakher.com/timeline-risks/08/04/2022/1828
Hence, from a historical perspective, it's unlikely that the State of Palestine will attack Israel after its establishment, but it's more likely that the State of Israel will continue to attack its neighbouring countries even after the establishment of the State of Palestine due to the Israeli dream about ‘Greater Israel’ (see below), so if someone would like to secure the peace in the Middle East, then they should start with disarming Israel. Otherwise, we have the risk for endless repeated wars in the Middle-East in the future only because of the State of Israel. Thus, If Trump would like to resolve it once and for all, then he should restrain Israel or find a ‘Nice Place’ for Israel (e.g., Texas State can fit because they really like Israel and Wars), and then we will get a peaceful Middle East.
Trump’s 20-point proposal to end the war in Gaza
Source: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-trumps-20-point-proposal-to-end-the-war-in-gaza
