2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher

Written By Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher

https://www.rozen-bakher.com/global-survival-rank-zrb/2023

Published: 29 April 2023

COPYRIGHT ©2022-2024 ZIVA ROZEN-BAKHER ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Global Survival Rank (GSR) by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher: Yearly Rank to Compare the Global Political Power among Countries, Alliances and Coalitions to Survive Long Wars at the Military, Economic, and Political Levels

Rozen-Bakher, Z. Global Survival Rank (GSR) by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher https://www.rozen-bakher.com/gsr

Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher

Researcher in International Relations and Foreign Policy with a Focus on International Security alongside Military, Political and Economic Risks for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and International Trade

CV

Acknowledge: The Geopolitical position of UN Members in the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) is based on Rozen-Bakher, Z., USA Coalition versus Russia-China Coalition, Monitoring Risks by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher, 12 February 2023, https://www.rozen-bakher.com/monitoring-risks/12/02/2023

For the convenience of the readers, certain parts from the USA Coalition versus Russia-China Coalition were added to this page, yet for full explanations, please see USA Coalition versus Russia-China Coalition.

List of Contents

  • Section A. Highlights, 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher

  • Section B. Introduction: Why do we need a Global Survival Rank?, 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher

  • Section C. Methodology, 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher

    • Section C1. Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7)

    • Section C2. Geopolitical Factors

      • Section C2.1 Sovereignty Status (M1)

      • Section D2.2 Religion (M2)

      • Section D2.3 Involvement in WWII (M3)

      • Section D2.4 Sanctions Against Russia (M4)

      • Section D2.5 UN Votes (M5)

      • Section D2.6 Multilateral Alliances, Multilateral Military Defence Treaties (MMDT), and Bilateral Military Defence Treaties (BMDT) (M6)

      • Section D2.7. Coalitions (M7)

    • Section C3. Comparison of NATO versus Counter-NATO

  • Section D. Analysis and Concluding Risk Remarks, 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher

  • Section E. Results, 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher

    • Section E1. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Geopolitical Position

      • Section E1.1. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Geopolitical Position, sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

      • Section E1.2. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Geopolitical Position, sorted by Alphabetical Order

    • Section E2. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7)

      • Section E2.1 All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7), sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

      • Section E2.2 All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7), sorted by Alphabetical Order

    • Section E3. Comparison of Coalitions by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

    • Section E4. Comparison of NATO versus Counter-NATO by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

    • Section E5. Colonies by Combination of Indicators: Area Size (R1), Population (R2), and Distance from Colony to Sovereign State (R4b)

 

List of Tables

  • Table 1. Top 20 of 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR), sorted by Coalitions, Section A

  • Table 2. Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7) and the Weight Average (WR) of Global Survival Rank (GSR), Section B

  • Table 3. UN Votes by Coalitions: Votes 1-8, Section D2.5

  • Table 4. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Geopolitical Position, sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR), Section E1.1

  • Table 5. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Geopolitical Position, sorted by Alphabetical Order, Section E1.2

  • Table 6. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7), sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR), Section E2.1

  • Table 7. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7), sorted by Alphabetical Order, Section E2.2

  • Table 8. Coalitions: USA Coalition, sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR), Section E3

  • Table 9. Coalitions: Russia-China Coalition, sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR), Section E3

  • Table 10. Not Voted in UN Votes (Votes 1-8) by Number of Not Voted

  • Table 11. Coalitions: ‘Sitting on the Fence’ Countries, sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR), Section E3

  • Table 12. Summary of Each Geopolitical Factors by Coalitions, Total

  • Table 13. Comparison of NATO versus Counter-NATO: 2023 GSR Indicators (R1-R7), Section E4

  • Table 14. NATO, sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR), Section E4

  • Table 15. Counter-NATO, sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR), Section E4

  • Table 16. Colonies by Combination of Indicators: Area Size (R1), Population (R2), and Distance from Colony to Sovereign State (R4b), sorted by the Simple Average of R1, R2 and R4b, Section E5

 

List of Charts

  • Chart 1. Total of Each GSR Indicator (R1-R7) by Coalitions, Section E3

  • Chart 2. The Rank of Each GSR Indicator (R1-R7) by Coalitions, Section E3

  • Chart 3. Comparison of NATO versus Counter-NATO: Total and Rank of Each 2023 GSR Indicators (R1-R7) and GSR Ranks, Section E4

 

List of Maps

  • Map 1. Sanctions Against Russia

  • Map 2. Coalitions in the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

  • Map 3. Religion Majority by Coalitions: USA Coalition versus Russia-China Coalition

  • Map 4. Interactive Map of Colonies by Sovereign States

 

Section A. Highlights, 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher

Table 1. Top 20 of 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR), sorted by Coalitions

 

Section B. Introduction: Why do we need a Global Survival Rank?, 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher

For full explanations about the reasoning for the Global Survival Rank (GSR):

 

Section C. Methodology, 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher

Section C1. Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7)

The Global Survival Rank (GSR) in any year includes the same Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7), including the same equation of the Weight Average (WR) of Global Survival Rank (GSR), as shown in Table 2 below. Thereby, the Global Survival Rank (GSR) includes the following GSR Indicators: Area Size (R1), Population and Army Size (R2), GDP and Military Expenditure in Long Wars (R3), Technology Level (R4), Natural Gas-Proved Reserves (R5), Oil-Proved Reserves (R6), Food Security (R7). Note, the Tables in Section E present the data sources used in the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR), including when they were retrieved.

For more explanation about the Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7), please see:

Table 2. Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7) and the Weight Average (WR) of Global Survival Rank (GSR)

 

Section C2. Geopolitical Factors

 

Section C2 - List of Contents

Section C2. Geopolitical Factors

  • Section C2.1 Sovereignty Status (M1)

  • Section D2.2 Religion (M2)

  • Section D2.3 Involvement in WWII (M3)

  • Section D2.4 Sanctions Against Russia (M4)

  • Section D2.5 UN Votes (M5)

  • Section D2.6 Multilateral Alliances, Multilateral Military Defence Treaties (MMDT), and Bilateral Military Defence Treaties (BMDT) (M6)

  • Section D2.7. Coalitions (M7)

 

Section C2.1 Sovereignty Status (M1)

  • UN Members and UN Observer States. The 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) includes only UN Members and UN Observer States, excluding SARs of China and the Disputed Countries Taiwan and Kosovo that are also included in the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR).

  • Colonies. The 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) does not include Colonies, but it only presents the Colonies based on three Global Survival Rank Indicators, as follows:

    • Area Size (R1)

    • Population (R2)

    • Distance From Colony to Sovereign State (R4b)

    The Colonies in the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) are presented as follows:

    • Colonies by the Rank of Each Indicator: R1, R2, and R4a.

    • Colonies by ‘Colony Survival Rank’ (Higher Survival to Lower Survival): Simple average of R1, R2, and R4a.

 

Section D2.2 Religion (M2)

This geopolitical factor refers to the major religion in a country, which gives additional background about the country. In general, among Islamic countries exists more antagonism towards the USA, which impacts their geopolitical position. This factor is based on various sources.

 

Section D2.3 Involvement in WWII (M3)

This geopolitical factor gives a past perspective on the involvement of each country in WWII, namely if a country or a past colony was actively involved in WWII or if it kept a fully neutral policy or only a partially neutral policy by giving only assistance without being actively involved in the war.

 

Section D2.4 Sanctions Against Russia (M4)

This geopolitical factor is based on the list of ‘Unfriendly Countries and Territories’, which was defined by Russia due to Sanctions that a certain country or territory imposed against Russia. The list of ‘Unfriendly Countries and Territories’ also includes Colonies (see Map 4 and Table 4 in USA Coalition versus Russia-China Coalition). However, keep in mind that Colonies have no voting rights in the UN, so it is possible to know the geopolitical position of a colony at the local level, which particularly applies for Colonies that aim to be independent countries. A colony could be defined as a territory that has a long distance from the sovereign country or if the location of the colony belongs naturally to another country or region.

 

Section D2.5 UN Votes (M5)

This geopolitical factor is based on 8 UN Votes, as shown in Table 3 below, which gives a clear indication of the geopolitical position of each country, regardless of the country's position towards the Sanctions against Russia.

Table 3. UN Votes by Coalitions: Votes 1-8

  • UN Votes 1-6. Since the start of the Ukraine war, six UN votes have took place in relation to the Russian invasion of Ukraine: two votes by the UN security council and four votes by the UN General Assembly, which reveal the position of each country regarding the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.

  • UN Vote 7. It refers to the vote that was carried out by the UN Human Rights Council regarding how Iran handled the riots in Iran. Iran becomes a strategic ally in the Russia-China Coalition, so this vote reveals how the core of the Russia-China Coalition unified beyond Iran against this resolution that was mainly led by the USA Coalition.

  • UN Vote 8. The vote regarding the New International Economic Order that was organised by Russia is the most important UN vote in relation to the ability to distinguish between countries that would like to keep the current global order that is dominated by the USA (Against by the USA Coalition) and countries that would like to change the current global order in a way that Russia and China will be the dominant superpowers instead of the USA (In-Favour by the Russia-China Coalition).

  • Additional Remarks about UN Votes.

    • Not Voted. ‘Not Voted’ and repeated ‘Not Voted’, in particular, serve de facto as ‘Against’ the USA Coalition or as ‘in-Favour’ the Russia-China Coalition, depends on the nature of the vote. Likely that a "secret vote" would have revealed the true position of these countries without the fear of pressure. Please see the Table of ‘Not Voted’ in Appendix II. Russia-China Coalition.

    • Favour versus Not Favour in UN Votes 1-7. To distinguish between countries that voted ‘In-favour’ (with the policy line of the USA) versus ‘Not in Favour’, we should take into account the votes of Against, Abstained, and Not Voted to see the total of ‘Not in Favour’ that de-facto refers to countries that did not give their support to the USA coalition. In other words, countries that voted ‘Not in Favour’ gave their support to the Russia-China Coalition instead of to the USA coalition. 

      • Favour in UN Votes 1-7 = Total of Favour = USA Coalition

      • Not Favour in UN Votes 1-7 = Total of Against, Abstained, and Not Voted = Russia-China Coalition

    • Against versus Not Against in UN Vote 8. To distinguish between countries that voted ‘Against’ (keeping the dominance of the USA) versus ‘Not Against’, we should take into account the votes of Favour, Abstained, and Not Voted to see the total of ‘Not Against’ that de-facto refers to countries that do not want to keep the current dominance of the USA. In other words, countries that voted ‘Not Against’ gave their support to the Russia-China Coalition instead of to the USA coalition.

      • Against in UN Vote 8 = Total of Against = USA Coalition

      • Not Against in UN Vote 8 = Total of Favour, Abstained, and Not Voted = Russia-China Coalition

 

Section D2.6 Multilateral Alliances, Multilateral Military Defence Treaties (MMDT), and Bilateral Military Defence Treaties (BMDT) (M6)

This geopolitical factor describes the alliances that each country belongs to, which is based on various sources. However, the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) includes only limited Multilateral Alliances, namely it includes only alliances that are related to the USA Coalition or the Russia-China Coalition, which are applicable to both Military alliances and Multilateral Trade alliances. In other words, this factor does not include bilateral Trade alliances between two certain countries or Multilateral Trade alliances that the USA or China or Russia does not belong to. Still, it includes the EU in order to distinguish between countries that belong only to the EU and not to NATO. However, this indicator includes both bilateral Military alliances and multilateral Military alliances that either the USA or China or Russia belong to.

Hence, the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) includes the following Multilateral Alliances:

  • Multilateral Alliances: BRICS, CIS, EAEU, EU, SCO, QIZ, USMCA

  • Multilateral Military Defence Treaties (MMDTs): CSTO and NATO

  • Bilateral Military Defence Treaties (BMDTs): Russia and China

For Background about the Multilateral Alliances included in the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR):

  • Rozen-Bakher, Z, BRICS, Monitoring Alliances by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher, https://www.rozen-bakher.com/alliances/brics-plus

  • Rozen-Bakher, Z, CIS - Commonwealth of Independent States, Monitoring Alliances by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher, https://www.rozen-bakher.com/alliances/cis

  • Rozen-Bakher, Z, EAEU - Eurasian Economic Union, Monitoring Alliances by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher, https://www.rozen-bakher.com/alliances/eaeu

  • Rozen-Bakher, Z, EU - European Union, Monitoring Alliances by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher, https://www.rozen-bakher.com/alliances/eu

  • Rozen-Bakher, Z, SCO - Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, Monitoring Alliances by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher, https://www.rozen-bakher.com/alliances/sco

  • Rozen-Bakher, Z, QIZ - Qualifying Industrial Zone, Monitoring Alliances by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher, https://www.rozen-bakher.com/alliances/qiz

  • Rozen-Bakher, Z, USMCA, Monitoring Alliances by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher, https://www.rozen-bakher.com/alliances/usmca

For Background about the Multilateral Military Defence Treaties (MMDTs) included in the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR):

For Background about the Bilateral Military Defence Treaties (BMDTs) included in the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR):

 

Section D2.7. Coalitions (M7)

Looking at the Geopolitical Factors: M1-M6 (see sections D2.1-D2.6 above) allows determining to which coalition each country belongs to. Hence, the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) includes three types of Coalitions, as follows:

  • USA Coalition

  • Russia-China Coalition

  • ‘Sitting on the Fence’ Countries

 

Section C3. Comparison of NATO versus Counter-NATO

The 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) includes a comparison between NATO versus Counter-NATO, as follows:

  • NATO. For Background about NATO, please see Rozen-Bakher, Z, NATO - North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Monitoring Alliances by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher, https://www.rozen-bakher.com/alliances/nato

  • Counter-NATO: Counter-NATO in the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) refers to the following Multilateral alliances, MMDTs and BMDTs:

    CSTO, China's Bilateral Military Defence Treaties, CIS, SCO, BRICS, and EAEU.

    For Background about Counter-NATO, please see Rozen-Bakher, Z, Military Alliances Led by Russia and China: MMDTs and BMDTs, Monitoring Alliances by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher, https://www.rozen-bakher.com/alliances/rcm

 

Section D. Analysis and Concluding Risk Remarks, 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher

Before the Ukraine war, the global order was based on three main superpowers: the USA, Russia, and China. The USA and China act as rivals in every aspect, while Russia positions itself in the centre, between the EU and China, yet Russia and the USA have been long-time old rivals since the cold war. However, the Ukraine war has changed the global order in a fundamental way. First, it forced each country to determine its position regarding the Ukraine war in a way that each country needed to decide whether to join the sanctions against Russia or not, as well as to decide its position regarding the UN votes about the Ukraine war and Russia (see UN Votes 1-6). Second, each country even had to decide via UN vote 8 whether to preserve the current global order that is dominated by the USA or to welcome a new global order that will be dominated by Russia and China (see UN Vote 8). Third, the West sanctions against Russia pushed Russia to shift its trade from Western countries to non-Western countries, which has led to a significant change in the trade alliances, such as BRICS and SCO, which have started to act not only as trade alliances but also as military alliances via frequent joint drills. Fourth, the Ukraine war also pushed Russia to deepen its strategic relations with China and even to form new strategic alliances, such as with Iran, which strengthened the political power of Iran in a significant way. It can be argued that the joining of Iran as a member of the alliances of SCO and BRICS, alongside the backup that Iran got in the UNHRC (see UN Vote 7), signals that Iran became an important strategic ally in the Russia-China Coalition.

Considering the above, as time passed since the start of the Ukraine war, it has become clear that we have two coalitions: the USA Coalition that includes countries that joined the Sanctions against Russia and opposed the new economic order (UN Vote 8), and the opposite, the Russia-China Coalition that includes countries that did not join the sanctions against Russia and welcomed the new economic order (UN Vote 8), and even gave backup to Russia in the UN votes by voting ‘Not Favour’ to Ukraine (UN Votes 1-6), especially by countries that are considered as the Core of the Russia-China Coalition. Nevertheless, several countries like Turkey can be considered as ‘Sitting on the Fence’ because they did not choose one side in this conflict, yet we can not consider them as neutral countries but as countries that are ‘Sitting on the Fence’ and waiting to see who is going to be more powerful under the new global order. Importantly, the Ukraine war has led to a ‘Merger of Allies’ between Russia and China in a way that each of them brought its allies to the joint coalition. To illustrate it, the Russia and China coalition is like a merger of two superpowers in a way that each superpower brings its ‘strategic assets’ (allies) to the joint coalition, so the synergy of the allies has led to more global political power compared to the global political power of each superpower, Russia or China, before the merger. Importantly, this merger has led to a situation that Russia got access to the allies of China, while China got access to the allies of Russia, which has strengthened the global political power of the Russia-China Coalition compared to the USA Coalition. In other words, before the Ukraine war, the USA was like a monopoly firm with two smaller rivals, Russia and China, while now, the merger between Russia and China forms like a unified big firm that has more ‘market share’ in terms of allies compared to the USA. More specifically, my analysis shows that the Russia-China Coalition includes 148 allies, while the USA coalition includes only 48 allies. However, looking at the Results of the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) (see Section E) shows a complicated picture in terms of which coalition has more likelihood to survive WWIII. The USA coalition has advantages in terms of Military expenditure and Technology Level, but the share of the countries with low survival rank among the USA Coalition is relatively high. In other words, the USA Coalition/NATO has too many countries with low survival rank compared to strong countries with high survival rank among the Russia-China Coalition. Importantly, the Russia-China Coalition has clear advantages in terms of area size, military size, energy and even food security, but on the other hand, the Russia-China Coalition includes many small countries with a very low survival rank, yet the Russia-China Coalition has more significant countries among the Top 20 countries with the highest survival rank (see Table 1).

In light of the above, my prediction is that the Ukraine war, instead of increasing the global political power of the USA, then it will lead to the opposite, namely it will backfire on the USA, especially in the long-run when Russia and China will achieve their objectives to change the economic system from domination by the USA to domination by Russia and China. Importantly, many see NATO as the promised ‘Joker card’ for survival in WWIII, but this analysis raises big challenges for NATO to win a war against the Russia-China Coalition or even to survive a long war. Time for reflection for those who push for global confrontation.

 

Section E. Results, 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR) by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher

 

Section E - List of Contents

  • Section E1. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Geopolitical Position

    • Section E1.1. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Geopolitical Position, sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

    • Section E1.2. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Geopolitical Position, sorted by Alphabetical Order

  • Section E2. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7)

    • Section E2.1 All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7), sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

    • Section E2.2 All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7), sorted by Alphabetical Order

  • Section E3. Comparison of Coalitions by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

  • Section E4. Comparison of NATO versus Counter-NATO by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

  • Section E5. Colonies by Combination of Indicators: Area Size (R1), Population (R2), and Distance from Colony to Sovereign State (R4b)

 

Section E1. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Geopolitical Position

Section E1.1. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Geopolitical Position, sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

Map 1. Sanctions Against Russia

Table 4. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Geopolitical Position, sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

 

Section E1.2. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Geopolitical Position, sorted by Alphabetical Order

Table 5. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Geopolitical Position, sorted by Alphabetical Order

 

Section E2. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7)

Section E2.1 All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7), sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

Table 6. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7), sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

 

Section E2.2 All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7), sorted by Alphabetical Order

Table 7. All Countries included in 2023 GSR: Global Survival Rank Indicators (R1-R7), sorted by Alphabetical Order

 

Section E3. Comparison of Coalitions by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

Map 2. Coalitions in the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

Map 3. Religion Majority by Coalitions: USA Coalition versus Russia-China Coalition

Chart 1. Total of Each GSR Indicator (R1-R7) by Coalitions

Chart 2. The Rank of Each GSR Indicator (R1-R7) by Coalitions

Table 8. Coalitions: USA Coalition, sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

 

Table 9. Coalitions: Russia-China Coalition, sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

Table 10. Not Voted in UN Votes (Votes 1-8) by Number of Not Voted

Note: Not Voted took place only among Russia-China Coalition

 

Table 11. Coalitions: ‘Sitting On the Fence’ Countries, sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

Table 12. Summary of Each Geopolitical Factors by Coalitions, Total

 

Section E4. Comparison of NATO versus Counter-NATO by 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

Table 13. Comparison of NATO versus Counter-NATO: 2023 GSR Indicators (R1-R7)

Chart 3. Comparison of NATO versus Counter-NATO: Total and Rank of Each 2023 GSR Indicators (R1-R7) and GSR Ranks

Table 14. NATO, sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

Table 15. Counter-NATO, sorted by the 2023 Global Survival Rank (GSR)

 

Section E5. Colonies by Combination of Indicators: Area Size (R1), Population (R2), and Distance From Colony to Sovereign State (R4b)

Map 4. Interactive Map of Colonies by Sovereign States

Table 16. Colonies by Combination of Indicators: Area Size (R1), Population (R2), and Distance From Colony to Sovereign State (R4b), sorted by the Simple Average of R1, R2 and R4b

Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher

Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher - A Researcher in International Relations with a Focus on Security, Political and Economic Risks for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and International Trade

https://www.rozen-bakher.com/
Previous

2024 Global Survival Rank (GSR) by Dr. Ziva Rozen-Bakher